Shortly after the London Tube bombings in 2005, a reader of Tim Blair, the Sydney Daily Telegraph’s columnar wag, sent him a note-perfect parody of a typical newspaper headline: “British Muslims Fear Repercussions Over Tomorrow’s Train Bombing.”
Indeed. And so it goes. This time round — Bombay — it was the Associated Press that filed a story about how Muslims “found themselves on the defensive once again about bloodshed linked to their religion.”
…
Tom Gross produced a jaw-dropping round-up of Bombay media coverage: The discovery that, for the first time in an Indian terrorist atrocity, Jews had been attacked, tortured, and killed produced from the New York Times a serene befuddlement: “It is not known if the Jewish center was strategically chosen, or if it was an accidental hostage scene.”
And, here’s the astonishingly obtuse feckless headline from that NYT article: Brooklyn Rabbi and Wife Caught in Attacks. An especially feckless example of agenda-driven propaganda, disguised as journalism, when, as Steyn reports:
The sole surviving “militant” revealed that the Jewish center had been targeted a year in advance.
Sigh.


Published Tuesday, December 9, 2008 at 9:29 pm
Posted in: Media